2012年2月5日日曜日

We Did Everything From To

we did everything from to

W.E.'s Andrea Riseborough on Madonna, Understanding Wallis Simpson, and the Mania of Venice

W.E. wasn't just an undertaking for Madonna, who directed her Wallis Simpson/Edward VIII biopic with all the lavish heft of a gigantic watercolor landscape. It was also a labor of love for Andrea Riseborough, the 30-year-old actress playing Simpson, the American socialite whose romance with Edward led to his abdication of the throne in 1936. The film's most enjoyable asset, Riseborough was saddled with making the polarizing Simpson a wholly charismatic figure -- an Evita without the benefit of torch songs. She succeeds, and with her thoroughly photogenic Edward (James D'Arcy) in tow, she softens W.E.'s melodrama with fantastic ease. We caught up with Riseborough to discuss her fascinating director, her feelings about the subject matter, and the zaniness of the Venice Film Festival.

You've been promoting this movie nonstop for months! Are you sick of corsets and gorgeous costuming at this point? Are the constraints of the couture caving in on you, so to speak?
That's very funny! No, I'm very much enamored with every different period. It's so funny because people often say -- or people talk about period pieces -- and I never really faction different periods or divide them from one another. I just think that really everything is of a specific period whether it be 2016 or 1810. It was extraordinary, the architectural feats that some of the couture gowns entailed on W.E. entailed. You have no idea. It was extraordinary.


But is it daunting to think of committing so much to the look and feel of a period piece again?
It's something I'm very familiar with. Because whether it is 2016 or 1810, it's very arduous. Specificity in any project, even if it exists in the abstract [Laughs] or it exists in an alternate reality, there's always a vision that everybody adheres to. Everybody very much passionately leans toward expressing that vision and the way we share it with the world. It's something that's very familiar to me, actually, I suppose is the answer to that. It's something I enjoy very much. It's transporting.

You are stunning in this movie. You really have the face of a beautiful silent screen star, or a young Bette Davis. Have you seen Dark Victory?
Oh I have, yes! Very much a part of my lexicon as a child.

Did you think your throwback looks would aid you in getting cast? Because you would definitely fit in with the stars of Wallis Simpson's time.
Not really, because when I'd been sent the script, I thought it was very unique. I wanted to explore a little more and was interested certainly in the character that was Wallis Simpson, when I went to meet with the director -- but when I met her, I actually had what could only be described as sandy blonde hair and a false tan. I was playing a modern character elsewhere. I'd never seen myself in one particular period. I know that my face is pretty plain and can look reasonably attractive but can also look horribly unattractive, and it's been something that's been a real benefit to me -- being a blank canvas. Muscularly, I can mold it anyway that I want to, if need be. Or I can completely relax it! So, no, I didn't think that -- no. What I saw ahead was like with any role, the journey of a transformation that was something so utterly far away from myself. It was something and is something I'm very fulfilled by.


For the record, James D'Arcy also looks just like Anthony Perkins. You can tell him I said so.
[Laughs.] Nobody's ever told him, but I can e-mail him if you like! [Laughs again.] E-mailing him now.

Madonna is known for being able to choose forthcoming trends, own them, and bring them to the pop culture fore. Before you met her, did you have any idea what would impress her, based solely on your knowledge of her before W.E.? Did you use that insight to get cast in the film?
My desire was not to impress; I wanted to see what fueled her passion for the story. I wanted to know what her vision was for it, and whether she would respond to what I could her offer her as a potential duchess. I think it would've been -- I would've been somebody else, actually. It's not who I am, I suppose. I was interested to see what our complicit working relationship would be. That was exciting to me. The story of the duchess was something I thought would be potentially interesting to excavate. I wanted to see within what framework that might possibly happen. She, very fortunately, responded to what I had to bring to her. Really, we were artistically complicit from that point on, from the outset really. She'd seen me play Margaret Thatcher and this other character before, so she had a good grasp on the reality that I could inhabit somebody who existed and somebody who was young and innocent -- this other character was young and innocent.

One interesting thing about W.E. is the sheer continental difference in knowledge about Wallis Simpson. In the U.K., everyone knows. In the U.S., plenty of people know nothing about that era of British history.
Oh, don't do yourself down!


I'm trying not to! But there's definitely a gap in awareness about who Wallis Simpson was. How do you feel addressing that with different markets for the film?
I think, really, the story transcends any historical context you might feel you need to put it in. Interestingly, of course, it was a reality. But what we have portrayed is our perception or version of the truth, Madonna's version and vision of a woman who really existed. The heart of the piece is the thing that'll tap on the door of the common man, if you will. Because, I hope, that was the thing that originally tapped on the door of the common man -- every one of the working class areas that Edward visited, the working men so very much appreciated him, took him into their homes in a way that a prince had not been taken in before. It's that same honesty and love and truth, I think, that people will feel and respond to. Wallis, she'd seen the writing on the wall. She ended up being as trapped as she imagined she would be, if he should abdicate, which he did as you know. It's impossible for any one person -- I mean, let's not even reduce it to gender -- it's impossible for any one person to live up to the responsibility of the kingdom. How does one man fulfill a partner who has given up such an awful, awful lot for their relationship?

Do you find yourself sorting out the fair criticism of W.E. from what might be considered a biased response to your director? Has the criticism been fair?
I really believe that people have their own relationship with it. And I say "with it," I mean everything that the film is. We were all part of making it. They can choose to absorb it and gain what is valuable from it any which way. I really have no opinion on it, to be truly honest, Louis. I know I'm incredibly honest to be part of something I found beautiful. That's really all I know.


Talk about the Venice Film Festival, where the world got its first taste of W.E. and the first swarm of responses to the film hit. Seemed pretty manic at the time. How do you remember it?
It felt incredibly special. It was almost like our first offering at something we'd been so lovingly baking. The explosion that then ensued was quite breathtaking. It was almost funny being so surrounded by love. I'm just speaking as honestly as I felt it!

Lastly, I heard you say that you and Madonna connected deeply in researching the "geeky" minutia of Wallis Simpson's life. How deeply did that fixation go?
Oh my gosh, that is such a long answer, Louis. Her fastidious research has no bounds! And that's where the answer lies. When you approach something that you're ignited by and are passionate about in such a way, really, until it seems to you're getting to the point where no stone is unturned, only then can you stop. When you imagine chronicling an entire woman's life from age 29 to 70, everything that went before 29 -- since it must be taken into account -- and everything that went after, you can imagine that's no small feat. I ferociously lapped that up. I enjoyed it so much. But none of that is worth anything if you can't just trust that it's been inside of you so you can be present when you're living out what might've been their life.

W.E. opens Friday in limited release.

[Top Photo: WireImage]



These are our most popular posts: we did everything from to

Prinzhorn Dance Schools Suzi Horn Talks Clay Class - Music ...

Were full-time. We did quite a lot of touring. And making the videos takes a lot of time, because we do absolutely everything. The first couple, we had somebody help us because we didnt know how to work the equipment, but ... read more

JCPenney CEO Brings Lessons From Apple « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

Like he did at Apple, the 30-year retail industry veteran says he plans to change the shopping experience, shun heavy discounting and sell services along with products. In an industry where the ... Here are some excerpts from the interview at Penneys Plano, Texas, headquarters, in which Johnson talked about everything from the challenges Penney faces to what stores he shops at: Q: Why Penney? ... what we did at Apple. Q: When will we start to see improvements? read more

Floundering

This means that (at any given time and not even all together, but at some point between coming home from work and going to sleep, Ive done these things): -I pick out tomorrows clothes and lay them out (check the .... need to take care of yourself. My mom did that whenever she got overwhelmed, and wed go off to my grandparents for the summer, and we came back to a happy, newly re-charged Mom who was ready to kick ass into gear :-). Login to post comments ... read more

McConnells Revisionist History: Congress Gave Obama Everything ...

The GOP didnt nothing to help the country move forward out of one of the biggest crisis weve ever faced. In fact, they did everything they could to prevent Democrats from pulling the country out of crisis. 2 years of nothing! read more

Related Posts



0 コメント:

コメントを投稿